- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- P2 vs M300 Mini
CHCNAV P2 vs ComNav M300 Mini
What P2 does better (2) and where M300 Mini wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is P2 better than M300 Mini?
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 5+20%
- Drop resistance1.2 m vs 1 m+20%
Why is M300 Mini better than P2?
- Weight1,000 g vs 800 g+25%
- Tracking channels336 vs 496+48%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3, L-band | — |
| Tracking channels | 336 | 496 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Correction sources | SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| External power input | 9V-36V | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| MIL-STD-810 | Yes | — |
| Drop resistance | 1.2 m | 1 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 1,000 g | 800 g |
| Width | — | 142 mm |
| Height | — | 52 mm |
| Depth | — | 191 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminum alloy | Rugged aluminum alloy |
