- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- P5 vs N2
CHCNAV P5 vs ComNav N2
What P5 does better (2) and where N2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
P5N2
| P5 | N2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 69 mm | 48 mm | +21 mm |
| Width | 150 mm | 149 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 2,150 g | 670 g | +1,480 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P5 better than N2?
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -30 °C+-25%
- Static accuracy (horizontal)2.5 mm vs 3 mm+20%
Why is N2 better than P5?
- Weight2,150 g vs 670 g3.2×
- Tracking channels624 vs 1,5902.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, B1, B2, B3 | — |
| Tracking channels | 624 | 1,590 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2.5 mm | 3 mm |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 20 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 10,000 mAh |
| External power input | 9 V DC to 36 V DC | 5/9V |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | — | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 2,150 g | 670 g |
| Width | 150 mm | 149 mm |
| Height | 69 mm | 48 mm |
| Depth | 200 mm | — |
| Housing material | — | magnesium aluminum alloy |
