- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- A200 Dual Antenna vs Archer 4
ComNav A200 Dual Antenna vs Juniper Archer 4
What A200 Dual Antenna does better (2) and where Archer 4 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
A200 Dual AntennaArcher 4
| A200 Dual Antenna | Archer 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 38 mm | 102 mm | −64 mm |
| Width | 460 mm | 42 mm | +418 mm |
| Depth | 58 mm | 34 mm | +24 mm |
| Weight | 627 g | 42 g | +585 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A200 Dual Antenna better than Archer 4?
- Tracking channels1,226 vs 1846.7×
- Built-in UHF radioYes · Archer 4: No
Why is Archer 4 better than A200 Dual Antenna?
- Weight627 g vs 42 g14.9×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | — |
| Tracking channels | 1,226 | 184 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2.5 mm | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | UHF radio, SBAS | NTRIP (internet) |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | No |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -30 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | — |
| Weight | 627 g | 42 g |
| Width | 460 mm | 42 mm |
| Height | 38 mm | 102 mm |
| Depth | 58 mm | 34 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminum-magnesium alloy housing | N/A |
