- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- A200 Dual Antenna vs Reach RS3
ComNav A200 Dual Antenna vs Emlid Reach RS3
What A200 Dual Antenna does better (0) and where Reach RS3 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Positioning4.5
Why is A200 Dual Antenna better than Reach RS3?
A200 Dual Antenna has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Reach RS3 better than A200 Dual Antenna?
Reach RS3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2 |
| Tracking channels | 1,226 | — |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2.5 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | UHF radio, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, LoRa radio, Cellular modem |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -30 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | — |
| Weight | 627 g | — |
| Width | 460 mm | — |
| Height | 38 mm | — |
| Depth | 58 mm | — |
| Housing material | Aluminum-magnesium alloy housing | — |







