LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. A200 Dual Antenna vs Trion V10i

ComNav A200 Dual Antenna vs FJD Trion V10i

What A200 Dual Antenna does better (2) and where Trion V10i wins (2) — every spec side by side.

ComNav A200 Dual Antenna
ComNav · 2023A200 Dual Antenna
6.4Score
2 advantages
vs
FJD Trion V10i
FJD · 2023Trion V10i
6.9Score
2 advantages
Higher score
4.6Positioning9.2
6.1Durability2.7

Why is A200 Dual Antenna better than Trion V10i?

  1. Weight627 g vs 1,000 g+59%
  2. Operating temperature (max)65 °C vs 60 °C+8%

Why is Trion V10i better than A200 Dual Antenna?

  1. Satellite systems supported5 vs 6+20%
  2. Tracking channels1,226 vs 1,408+15%
Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systemsGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS)
Satellite systems supported56
Tracking channels1,2261,408
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)Yes—
RTK positioningYes—
RTK accuracy (horizontal)8 mm—
Static accuracy (horizontal)2.5 mm—
Tilt compensation (IMU)—Yes
Max. tilt angle—60°
Dual-antenna headingYes—
Correction sourcesUHF radio, SBASUHF radio
Built-in UHF radioYesYes
Connectivity & safety
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
USB-CYes—
Camera—Yes
Battery & power
Battery life—15 h
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Drop resistance2 m—
Operating temperature (min)-30 °C-30 °C
Operating temperature (max)65 °C60 °C
Weight627 g1,000 g
Width460 mm—
Height38 mm—
Depth58 mm—
Housing materialAluminum-magnesium alloy housingAluminum Magnesium Alloy
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare