- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- M300 Pro II vs V60
ComNav M300 Pro II vs Hi-Target V60
What M300 Pro II does better (1) and where V60 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.9Positioning2.6
2.7Durability3.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
M300 Pro IIV60
| M300 Pro II | V60 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 67 mm | 98 mm | −31 mm |
| Width | 176 mm | 182 mm | −6 mm |
| Weight | 2,830 g | 1,250 g | +1,580 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M300 Pro II better than V60?
- Tracking channels574 vs 2202.6×
Why is V60 better than M300 Pro II?
- Weight2,830 g vs 1,250 g2.3×
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -45 °C+-11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, B1, B2, B3, L-band | L1, L2, L5, E5a, E5b, B1, B2 |
| Tracking channels | 574 | 220 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2 mm | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | SBAS |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 15 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| External power input | ±18 - ±75VDC, with overvoltage protection | 6V to 28V DC |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -45 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 2,830 g | 1,250 g |
| Width | 176 mm | 182 mm |
| Height | 67 mm | 98 mm |
| Depth | 267 mm | — |
| Housing material | Rugged aluminum case with rubber ring | Magnesium alloy |
