- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- M300 Mini vs V60
ComNav M300 Mini vs Hi-Target V60
What M300 Mini does better (3) and where V60 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M300 MiniV60
| M300 Mini | V60 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 52 mm | 98 mm | −46 mm |
| Width | 142 mm | 182 mm | −40 mm |
| Weight | 800 g | 1,250 g | −450 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M300 Mini better than V60?
- Weight800 g vs 1,250 g+56%
- Tracking channels496 vs 2202.3×
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 65 °C+15%
Why is V60 better than M300 Mini?
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -45 °C+-11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E5a, E5b, B1, B2 |
| Tracking channels | 496 | 220 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 15 mm | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2.5 mm | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS | SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 15 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| External power input | — | 6V to 28V DC |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 1 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -45 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 800 g | 1,250 g |
| Width | 142 mm | 182 mm |
| Height | 52 mm | 98 mm |
| Depth | 191 mm | — |
| Housing material | Rugged aluminum alloy | Magnesium alloy |
