- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Skadi 300 vs Archer 4
Eos Skadi 300 vs Juniper Archer 4
What Skadi 300 does better (1) and where Archer 4 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Skadi 300 better than Archer 4?
- L-band / PPP correctionsYes · Archer 4: No
Why is Archer 4 better than Skadi 300?
- Weight935 g vs 42 g22.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | — |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E5a, E5b, B1, B2 | — |
| Tracking channels | — | 184 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet) |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | No |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Hot-swappable batteries | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Operating temperature (min) | -15 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 50 °C | — |
| Weight | 935 g | 42 g |
| Width | — | 42 mm |
| Height | — | 102 mm |
| Depth | — | 34 mm |
| Housing material | Xenoy® with TPU overmold | N/A |
