- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Skadi 300 vs Z1
Eos Skadi 300 vs SingularXYZ Z1
What Skadi 300 does better (1) and where Z1 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is Skadi 300 better than Z1?
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 5+20%
Why is Z1 better than Skadi 300?
- Weight935 g vs 547 g+71%
- Operating temperature (min)-15 °C vs -40 °C+-62%
- Operating temperature (max)50 °C vs 65 °C+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E5a, E5b, B1, B2 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | — | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 60° |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP, SBAS | UHF radio, LoRa radio, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 4 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 15 h |
| Hot-swappable batteries | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | — | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -15 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 50 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 935 g | 547 g |
| Width | — | 107 mm |
| Height | — | 59 mm |
| Depth | — | 107 mm |
| Housing material | Xenoy® with TPU overmold | Magnesium-aluminum alloy |
