- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Approach G82 vs Approach Z82
Garmin Approach G82 vs Garmin Approach Z82
What Approach G82 does better (1) and where Approach Z82 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Maps & navigation8.1
6.6Battery4.0
4.8Durability5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Approach G82Approach Z82
| Approach G82 | Approach Z82 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160 mm | 80 mm | +80 mm |
| Width | 84 mm | 123 mm | −39 mm |
| Depth | 22 mm | 42 mm | −20 mm |
| Weight | 308 g | 232 g | +76 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Approach G82 better than Approach Z82?
- Battery life25 h vs 15 h+67%
Why is Approach Z82 better than Approach G82?
- Weight308 g vs 232 g+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Satellite systems supported | 1 | 1 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | No | No |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5″ | — |
| Resolution | 480 × 800 | — |
| Horizontal resolution | 480 px | — |
| Vertical resolution | 800 px | — |
| Pixel density | 187 ppi | — |
| Display type | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) | OLED / AMOLED |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | Yes |
| Map coverage | Worldwide | Worldwide |
| Map types | Golf courses | Golf courses |
| Preloaded golf courses | 43,000 | 43,000 |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 25 h | 15 h |
| Power source | Built-in rechargeable | Built-in rechargeable |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Weight | 308 g | 232 g |
| Width | 84 mm | 123 mm |
| Height | 160 mm | 80 mm |
| Depth | 22 mm | 42 mm |
