- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- zūmo XT3 vs Magic L
Garmin zūmo XT3 vs INTEC Magic L
What zūmo XT3 does better (1) and where Magic L wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
zūmo XT3Magic L
| zūmo XT3 | Magic L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 75 mm | 109 mm | −34 mm |
| Width | 128 mm | 132 mm | −4 mm |
| Depth | 24 mm | 132 mm | −108 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 850 g | −660 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is zūmo XT3 better than Magic L?
- Weight190 g vs 850 g4.5×
Why is Magic L better than zūmo XT3?
- Battery life7 h vs 18 h2.6×
- Satellite systems supported2 vs 52.5×
- Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)No · zūmo XT3: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 2 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | No | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | — | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 120° |
| Correction sources | — | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 4.7″ | — |
| Resolution | 1280 × 720 | — |
| Horizontal resolution | 1,280 px | — |
| Vertical resolution | 720 px | — |
| Pixel density | 315 ppi | — |
| Display type | Colour TFT LCD | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Glove-friendly touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | — |
| Map coverage | North America | — |
| Map types | Road, Topographic, Satellite imagery | — |
| Turn-by-turn routing | Yes | — |
| Free map updates | Yes | — |
| Live traffic | Yes | — |
| Speed camera alerts | Yes | — |
| Driver alerts (speed limits, curves) | Yes | — |
| Lane assist / junction view | Yes | — |
| Satellite imagery | Yes | — |
| Internal storage | 64 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smartphone notifications | Yes | — |
| Camera | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 18 h |
| Power source | Built-in rechargeable | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Weight | 190 g | 850 g |
| Width | 128 mm | 132 mm |
| Height | 75 mm | 109 mm |
| Depth | 24 mm | 132 mm |
| Housing material | — | ABS |
Related comparisons
vs
Garmin zūmo XT3vsGarmin Tread 2
8.78.4
vs
Garmin zūmo XT3vsGarmin Tread 2 SxS Edition
8.76.6
vs
Garmin zūmo XT3vsGarmin Tread XL Overland Edition
8.75.0
vs
Garmin zūmo XT3vsGarmin Tread XL Baja Race Edition
8.75.5
vs
SingularXYZ SV200 INSvsINTEC Magic L
8.78.9
vs
INTEC Magic LvsArchimedes Innovation D600
8.99.5