- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- inBase vs GRX5
INTEC inBase vs Sokkia GRX5
What inBase does better (3) and where GRX5 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is inBase better than GRX5?
- Battery life18 h vs 15 h+20%
- Tracking channels1,408 vs 4483.1×
- Weight850 g vs 995 g+17%
Why is GRX5 better than inBase?
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 6+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 448 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 5 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 10 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 3 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | 120° | 60° |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, LoRa radio, Cellular modem, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 20 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 18 h | 15 h |
| Power source | — | Built-in rechargeable |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 65 °C |
| Weight | 850 g | 995 g |
| Width | — | 139 mm |
| Height | — | 97 mm |
| Depth | — | 139 mm |
| Housing material | ABS | Magnesium |
