- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Marvel Lite vs TRIUMPH-3NR
INTEC Marvel Lite vs JAVAD TRIUMPH-3NR
What Marvel Lite does better (3) and where TRIUMPH-3NR wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Positioning3.3
9.0Battery9.6
8.2Durability8.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Marvel LiteTRIUMPH-3NR
| Marvel Lite | TRIUMPH-3NR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 89 mm | 61 mm | +28 mm |
| Width | 120 mm | 132 mm | −12 mm |
| Depth | 89 mm | 85 mm | +4 mm |
| Weight | 660 g | 630 g | +30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Marvel Lite better than TRIUMPH-3NR?
- Tracking channels1,408 vs 874+61%
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 60 °C+25%
- Operating temperature (min)-45 °C vs -40 °C+-11%
Why is TRIUMPH-3NR better than Marvel Lite?
- Battery life20 h vs 25 h+25%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 6+50%
- Weight660 g vs 630 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | No |
| Frequency bands | — | L-band |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 874 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Correction sources | UHF radio, LoRa radio, SBAS | — |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 31 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 25 h |
| External power input | — | 10-30 VDC |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Operating temperature (min) | -45 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 60 °C |
| Weight | 660 g | 630 g |
| Width | 120 mm | 132 mm |
| Height | 89 mm | 61 mm |
| Depth | 89 mm | 85 mm |
| Housing material | ABS | Hardened Plastic |
