- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Marvel Lite vs SL8
INTEC Marvel Lite vs SatLab SL8
What Marvel Lite does better (4) and where SL8 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
3.1Positioning8.7
9.0Battery7.8
8.2Durability7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Marvel LiteSL8
| Marvel Lite | SL8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 89 mm | 72 mm | +17 mm |
| Width | 120 mm | 131 mm | −11 mm |
| Weight | 660 g | 730 g | −70 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Marvel Lite better than SL8?
- Battery life20 h vs 16 h+25%
- Operating temperature (min)-45 °C vs -20 °C+-56%
- Weight660 g vs 730 g+11%
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 50 °C+50%
Why is SL8 better than Marvel Lite?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 6+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 60° |
| Correction sources | UHF radio, LoRa radio, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, LoRa radio, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Camera | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 16 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Operating temperature (min) | -45 °C | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 50 °C |
| Weight | 660 g | 730 g |
| Width | 120 mm | 131 mm |
| Height | 89 mm | 72 mm |
| Depth | 89 mm | — |
| Housing material | ABS | — |
