- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Marvel Lite vs S999
INTEC Marvel Lite vs Stonex S999
What Marvel Lite does better (5) and where S999 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
3.1Positioning7.2
9.0Battery5.1
8.2Durability7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Marvel LiteS999
| Marvel Lite | S999 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 89 mm | 74 mm | +15 mm |
| Width | 120 mm | 139 mm | −19 mm |
| Depth | 89 mm | 139 mm | −50 mm |
| Weight | 660 g | 1,065 g | −405 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Marvel Lite better than S999?
- Battery life20 h vs 10 h2×
- Weight660 g vs 1,065 g+61%
- Built-in UHF radioYes · S999: No
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 65 °C+15%
- Operating temperature (min)-45 °C vs -40 °C+-11%
Why is S999 better than Marvel Lite?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 6+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 6 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 60° |
| Correction sources | UHF radio, LoRa radio, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 31 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Camera | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 10 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 13,600 mAh |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Operating temperature (min) | -45 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 660 g | 1,065 g |
| Width | 120 mm | 139 mm |
| Height | 89 mm | 74 mm |
| Depth | 89 mm | 139 mm |
| Housing material | ABS | — |
