- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Marvel vs Archer 4
INTEC Marvel vs Juniper Archer 4
What Marvel does better (1) and where Archer 4 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Marvel better than Archer 4?
- Tracking channels1,408 vs 1847.7×
Why is Archer 4 better than Marvel?
- Weight660 g vs 42 g15.7×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | — |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 184 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 5 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), SBAS | NTRIP (internet) |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | No |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Camera | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Weight | 660 g | 42 g |
| Width | — | 42 mm |
| Height | — | 102 mm |
| Depth | — | 34 mm |
| Housing material | ABS | N/A |
