- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Marvel vs TGS
INTEC Marvel vs TechnoGIS TGS
What Marvel does better (1) and where TGS wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is Marvel better than TGS?
- Weight660 g vs 850 g+29%
Why is TGS better than Marvel?
- Battery life20 h vs 30 h+50%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 6+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3, L-band |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 5 mm | 5 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Position update rate | — | 1 Hz |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 60° |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Camera | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 30 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Drop resistance | — | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 85 °C |
| Weight | 660 g | 850 g |
| Width | — | 85 mm |
| Height | — | 130 mm |
| Depth | — | 130 mm |
| Housing material | ABS | Magnesium Alloy and ABS industrial grade |
