- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Archer 4 vs R580
Juniper Archer 4 vs Trimble R580
What Archer 4 does better (1) and where R580 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Archer 4R580
| Archer 4 | R580 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 102 mm | 114 mm | −12 mm |
| Width | 42 mm | 140 mm | −98 mm |
| Weight | 42 g | 1,080 g | −1,038 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Archer 4 better than R580?
- Weight42 g vs 1,080 g25.7×
Why is R580 better than Archer 4?
- Built-in UHF radioNo · Archer 4: Yes
- L-band / PPP correctionsNo · Archer 4: Yes
- Tracking channels184 vs 336+83%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | — | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5 |
| Tracking channels | 184 | 336 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 10 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 10 mm |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet) | UHF radio, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | No | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | No | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP65 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 55 °C |
| Weight | 42 g | 1,080 g |
| Width | 42 mm | 140 mm |
| Height | 102 mm | 114 mm |
| Depth | 34 mm | — |
| Housing material | N/A | Plastic with metal endoskeleton |
