LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. GPS & navigation
  3. eSurvey eRTK80
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to eSurvey eRTK80

10 GNSS / RTK receivers at a similar price that compete with the eRTK80 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the eRTK80

SpatiX Q700
1
SpatiX · 2026Q700
7.4
  • Battery life 14 h vs 10 h
  • Battery capacity 13,600 mAh vs 3,400 mAh
  • Weight 985 g vs 1,100 g
Stonex S1000
2
Stonex · 2026S1000
7.6
  • RTK accuracy (horizontal) 5 mm vs 8 mm
  • Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)
  • Battery life 12 h vs 10 h
  • Drop resistance 1.5 m vs 2 m
SingularXYZ Xbase
3
SingularXYZ · 2026Xbase
4.2
  • Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)
  • Battery life 8 h vs 10 h
  • Weight 1,204 g vs 1,100 g
Alpha GEO Matrix X
4
Alpha GEO · 2026Matrix X
7.8
  • Battery life 15 h vs 10 h
  • Weight 1,000 g vs 1,100 g
  • Operating temperature (min) -40 °C vs -30 °C
  • Water protection (IPx) IPx7 vs IPx8
eSurvey eRTK10 Pro
5
eSurvey · 2026eRTK10 Pro
6.2
  • Weight 475 g vs 1,100 g
  • Battery capacity 5,800 mAh vs 3,400 mAh
  • Operating temperature (max) 70 °C vs 65 °C
ZENiTH Z30 PRO
6
ZENiTH · 2026Z30 PRO
4.2
  • Weight 950 g vs 1,100 g
  • Operating temperature (max) 70 °C vs 65 °C
  • Water protection (IPx) IPx7 vs IPx8
INTEC Magic L
7
INTEC · 2026Magic L
8.9
  • Battery life 18 h vs 10 h
  • Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)
  • Weight 850 g vs 1,100 g
  • Satellite systems supported 5 vs 6
ComNav Mercury Laser RTK
9
ComNav · 2026Mercury Laser RTK
5.3
  • Weight 500 g vs 1,100 g
  • Battery life 15 h vs 10 h
  • Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)
  • Built-in UHF radio
  • Internal storage 4 GB vs 8 GB
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare