- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- L300 vs i83
Alpha GEO L300 vs CHCNAV i83
What L300 does better (2) and where i83 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
L300i83
| L300 | i83 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150 mm | 78 mm | +72 mm |
| Width | 150 mm | 152 mm | −2 mm |
| Depth | 71 mm | 152 mm | −81 mm |
| Weight | 1,000 g | 1,150 g | −150 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is L300 better than i83?
- Weight1,000 g vs 1,150 g+15%
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 65 °C+15%
Why is i83 better than L300?
- Battery life12 h vs 18 h+50%
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 5+25%
- Battery capacity6,800 mAh vs 9,600 mAh+41%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | — |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 12 h | 18 h |
| Battery capacity | 6,800 mAh | 9,600 mAh |
| Power source | — | Removable rechargeable pack |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 1,000 g | 1,150 g |
| Width | 150 mm | 152 mm |
| Height | 150 mm | 78 mm |
| Depth | 71 mm | 152 mm |
| Housing material | ABS,aluminium alloy | — |
