- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Flex vs G200
Bad Elf Flex vs ComNav G200
What Flex does better (4) and where G200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
FlexG200
| Flex | G200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 254 mm | 50 mm | +204 mm |
| Width | 70 mm | 72 mm | −2 mm |
| Depth | 70 mm | 137 mm | −67 mm |
| Weight | 854 g | 350 g | +504 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Flex better than G200?
- Battery life11 h vs 9 h+22%
- Tracking channels800 vs 3522.3×
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 4+25%
- Operating temperature (min)-30 °C vs -20 °C+-33%
Why is G200 better than Flex?
- Weight854 g vs 350 g2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 4 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2 |
| Tracking channels | 800 | 352 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 3 mm |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP, SBAS | SBAS |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 11 h | 9 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,400 mAh |
| External power input | 12 A/h | 5-27 VDC |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP65 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Drop resistance | — | 1.5 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -30 °C | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 60 °C | 60 °C |
| Weight | 854 g | 350 g |
| Width | 70 mm | 72 mm |
| Height | 254 mm | 50 mm |
| Depth | 70 mm | 137 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminum | — |
