- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Flex vs M300 Mini
Bad Elf Flex vs ComNav M300 Mini
What Flex does better (1) and where M300 Mini wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
FlexM300 Mini
| Flex | M300 Mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 254 mm | 52 mm | +202 mm |
| Width | 70 mm | 142 mm | −72 mm |
| Depth | 70 mm | 191 mm | −121 mm |
| Weight | 854 g | 800 g | +54 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Flex better than M300 Mini?
- Tracking channels800 vs 496+61%
Why is M300 Mini better than Flex?
- Weight854 g vs 800 g+7%
- Operating temperature (min)-30 °C vs -40 °C+-25%
- Operating temperature (max)60 °C vs 75 °C+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Tracking channels | 800 | 496 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 11 h | — |
| External power input | 12 A/h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | — | 1 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -30 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 60 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 854 g | 800 g |
| Width | 70 mm | 142 mm |
| Height | 254 mm | 52 mm |
| Depth | 70 mm | 191 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminum | Rugged aluminum alloy |
