- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- CGI-230 vs R580
CHCNAV CGI-230 vs Trimble R580
What CGI-230 does better (3) and where R580 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
CGI-230R580
| CGI-230 | R580 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 350 mm | 114 mm | +236 mm |
| Width | 105 mm | 140 mm | −35 mm |
| Weight | 400 g | 1,080 g | −680 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CGI-230 better than R580?
- Weight400 g vs 1,080 g2.7×
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -20 °C+-50%
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 55 °C+36%
Why is R580 better than CGI-230?
R580 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | — | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5 |
| Tracking channels | — | 336 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 10 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 10 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | — | UHF radio, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP65 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 55 °C |
| Weight | 400 g | 1,080 g |
| Width | 105 mm | 140 mm |
| Height | 350 mm | 114 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | — |
| Housing material | — | Plastic with metal endoskeleton |
