LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 869Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. CGI-830 vs Marvel Lite

CHCNAV CGI-830 vs INTEC Marvel Lite

What CGI-830 does better (0) and where Marvel Lite wins (2) — every spec side by side.

CHCNAV CGI-830
CHCNAV · 2024CGI-830
6.1Score
0 advantages
vs
INTEC Marvel Lite
INTEC · 2024Marvel Lite
9.2Score
2 advantages
Higher score
4.8Durability8.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

CGI-830Marvel Lite
120 × 53162120 × 8989
CGI-830Marvel LiteDifference
Height53 mm89 mm−36 mm
Width120 mm120 mm=
Depth162 mm89 mm+73 mm
Weight1,150 g660 g+490 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is CGI-830 better than Marvel Lite?

CGI-830 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Marvel Lite better than CGI-830?

  1. Weight1,150 g vs 660 g+74%
  2. Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -45 °C+-11%
Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systems—GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
Satellite systems supported—4
Tracking channels—1,408
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)—Yes
Tilt compensation (IMU)YesYes
Correction sourcesNTRIP (internet), Cellular modemUHF radio, LoRa radio, SBAS
Built-in UHF radio—Yes
Connectivity & safety
Wi-FiYes—
Bluetooth—Yes
Cellular modem (4G / LTE)Yes—
Battery & power
Battery life—20 h
External power input9 V ~ 32 V DC Standard Adaptation 12 V DC—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx7
MIL-STD-810Yes—
Operating temperature (min)-40 °C-45 °C
Operating temperature (max)75 °C75 °C
Weight1,150 g660 g
Width120 mm120 mm
Height53 mm89 mm
Depth162 mm89 mm
Housing material—ABS
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare