- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- i83 vs P5
CHCNAV i83 vs CHCNAV P5
What i83 does better (2) and where P5 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
i83P5
| i83 | P5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 78 mm | 69 mm | +9 mm |
| Width | 152 mm | 150 mm | +2 mm |
| Depth | 152 mm | 200 mm | −48 mm |
| Weight | 1,150 g | 2,150 g | −1,000 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is i83 better than P5?
- Weight1,150 g vs 2,150 g+87%
- Tracking channels1,408 vs 6242.3×
Why is P5 better than i83?
- Battery life18 h vs 20 h+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 624 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), SBAS | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 18 h | 20 h |
| Battery capacity | 9,600 mAh | — |
| Power source | Removable rechargeable pack | — |
| External power input | — | 9 V DC to 36 V DC |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 1,150 g | 2,150 g |
| Width | 152 mm | 150 mm |
| Height | 78 mm | 69 mm |
| Depth | 152 mm | 200 mm |
