LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 869Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. P5 vs M300 Pro II

CHCNAV P5 vs ComNav M300 Pro II

What P5 does better (2) and where M300 Pro II wins (1) — every spec side by side.

CHCNAV P5
CHCNAV · 2020P5
7.6Score
2 advantages
Higher score
vs
ComNav M300 Pro II
ComNav · 2020M300 Pro II
4.8Score
1 advantage
3.7Positioning5.9
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
2.8Durability2.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

P5M300 Pro II
150 × 69200176 × 67267
P5M300 Pro IIDifference
Height69 mm67 mm+2 mm
Width150 mm176 mm−26 mm
Depth200 mm267 mm−67 mm
Weight2,150 g2,830 g−680 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is P5 better than M300 Pro II?

  1. Weight2,150 g vs 2,830 g+32%
  2. Tracking channels624 vs 574+9%

Why is M300 Pro II better than P5?

  1. Static accuracy (horizontal)2.5 mm vs 2 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systemsGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS
Satellite systems supported55
Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)YesYes
Frequency bandsL1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, B1, B2, B3L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, B1, B2, B3, L-band
Tracking channels624574
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)YesYes
RTK positioning—Yes
RTK accuracy (horizontal)—8 mm
Static accuracy (horizontal)2.5 mm2 mm
Correction sourcesNTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, SBASNTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS
L-band / PPP corrections—Yes
Raw data logging (RINEX)Yes—
Connectivity & safety
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYesYes
Cellular modem (4G / LTE)YesYes
Battery & power
Battery life20 h—
External power input9 V DC to 36 V DC±18 - ±75VDC, with overvoltage protection
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Operating temperature (min)-40 °C-40 °C
Operating temperature (max)65 °C65 °C
Weight2,150 g2,830 g
Width150 mm176 mm
Height69 mm67 mm
Depth200 mm267 mm
Housing material—Rugged aluminum case with rubber ring
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare