- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- A100 vs M600 mini
ComNav A100 vs ComNav M600 mini
What A100 does better (3) and where M600 mini wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
A100M600 mini
| A100 | M600 mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 72 mm | 53 mm | +19 mm |
| Width | 132 mm | 191 mm | −59 mm |
| Depth | 132 mm | 142 mm | −10 mm |
| Weight | 700 g | 800 g | −100 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A100 better than M600 mini?
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 3+33%
- Drop resistance2 m vs 1 m2×
- Weight700 g vs 800 g+14%
Why is M600 mini better than A100?
- Tracking channels352 vs 404+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 3 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2 | L1, L2, B1, B2 |
| Tracking channels | 352 | 404 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2.5 mm | 2.5 mm |
| Dual-antenna heading | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| External power input | 6 - 36 VDC, with overvoltage protection | 6 - 28 VDC |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | 1 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 700 g | 800 g |
| Width | 132 mm | 191 mm |
| Height | 72 mm | 53 mm |
| Depth | 132 mm | 142 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminum-magnesium alloy | Aluminum alloy |
