- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- M300 Mini vs M600 mini
ComNav M300 Mini vs ComNav M600 mini
What M300 Mini does better (2) and where M600 mini wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M300 MiniM600 mini
| M300 Mini | M600 mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 52 mm | 53 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 142 mm | 191 mm | −49 mm |
| Depth | 191 mm | 142 mm | +49 mm |
| Weight | 800 g | 800 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M300 Mini better than M600 mini?
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 3+67%
- Tracking channels496 vs 404+23%
Why is M600 mini better than M300 Mini?
M600 mini has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 3 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, B1, B2 |
| Tracking channels | 496 | 404 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 15 mm | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2.5 mm | 2.5 mm |
| Dual-antenna heading | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| External power input | — | 6 - 28 VDC |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Drop resistance | 1 m | 1 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 800 g | 800 g |
| Width | 142 mm | 191 mm |
| Height | 52 mm | 53 mm |
| Depth | 191 mm | 142 mm |
| Housing material | Rugged aluminum alloy | Aluminum alloy |
