- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- A200 Dual Antenna vs SC600+
ComNav A200 Dual Antenna vs Stonex SC600+
What A200 Dual Antenna does better (0) and where SC600+ wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Positioning5.1
6.1Durability6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
A200 Dual AntennaSC600+
| A200 Dual Antenna | SC600+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 38 mm | 34 mm | +4 mm |
| Width | 460 mm | 150 mm | +310 mm |
| Depth | 58 mm | 105 mm | −47 mm |
| Weight | 627 g | 550 g | +77 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A200 Dual Antenna better than SC600+?
A200 Dual Antenna has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is SC600+ better than A200 Dual Antenna?
- Weight627 g vs 550 g+14%
- Tracking channels1,226 vs 1,408+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,226 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2.5 mm | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | UHF radio, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -30 °C | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 627 g | 550 g |
| Width | 460 mm | 150 mm |
| Height | 38 mm | 34 mm |
| Depth | 58 mm | 105 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminum-magnesium alloy housing | — |
