LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. G100 vs G200

ComNav G100 vs ComNav G200

What G100 does better (0) and where G200 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

ComNav G100
ComNav · 2017G100
3.5Score
0 advantages
vs
ComNav G200
ComNav · 2018G200
3.6Score
3 advantages
Higher score
2.0Positioning2.5
2.7Battery2.7
2.5Durability2.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

G100G200
72 × 5013772 × 50137
G100G200Difference
Height50 mm50 mm=
Width72 mm72 mm=
Depth137 mm137 mm=
Weight350 g350 g=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is G100 better than G200?

G100 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is G200 better than G100?

  1. Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)No · G100: Yes
  2. Satellite systems supported3 vs 4+33%
  3. Tracking channels200 vs 352+76%
Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systemsGPS, GLONASS, BeiDouGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
Satellite systems supported34
Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)NoYes
Frequency bandsL1, B1L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2
Tracking channels200352
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)YesYes
RTK positioning—Yes
RTK accuracy (horizontal)—8 mm
Static accuracy (horizontal)—3 mm
Correction sourcesSBASSBAS
Connectivity & safety
BluetoothYesYes
Battery & power
Battery life9 h9 h
Battery capacity3,400 mAh3,400 mAh
External power input5-27 VDC5-27 VDC
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP65IP65
Water protection (IPx)IPx5IPx5
Drop resistance1.5 m1.5 m
Operating temperature (min)-20 °C-20 °C
Operating temperature (max)60 °C60 °C
Weight350 g350 g
Width72 mm72 mm
Height50 mm50 mm
Depth137 mm137 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare