- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- G100 vs M600 mini
ComNav G100 vs ComNav M600 mini
What G100 does better (2) and where M600 mini wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
G100M600 mini
| G100 | M600 mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 50 mm | 53 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 72 mm | 191 mm | −119 mm |
| Depth | 137 mm | 142 mm | −5 mm |
| Weight | 350 g | 800 g | −450 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is G100 better than M600 mini?
- Weight350 g vs 800 g2.3×
- Drop resistance1.5 m vs 1 m+50%
Why is M600 mini better than G100?
- Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)No · G100: Yes
- Tracking channels200 vs 4042×
- Operating temperature (min)-20 °C vs -40 °C+-50%
- Operating temperature (max)60 °C vs 75 °C+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou |
| Satellite systems supported | 3 | 3 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | No | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, B1 | L1, L2, B1, B2 |
| Tracking channels | 200 | 404 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Dual-antenna heading | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| External power input | 5-27 VDC | 6 - 28 VDC |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP65 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Drop resistance | 1.5 m | 1 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -20 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 60 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 350 g | 800 g |
| Width | 72 mm | 191 mm |
| Height | 50 mm | 53 mm |
| Depth | 137 mm | 142 mm |
| Housing material | — | Aluminum alloy |
