- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Jupiter Laser RTK vs Horus Visual & Laser
ComNav Jupiter Laser RTK vs SingularXYZ Horus Visual & Laser
What Jupiter Laser RTK does better (5) and where Horus Visual & Laser wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Positioning6.3
2.1Maps & navigation4.9
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
7.1Battery4.8
8.6Durability5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Jupiter Laser RTKHorus Visual & Laser
| Jupiter Laser RTK | Horus Visual & Laser | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 66 mm | 72 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 134 mm | 133 mm | +1 mm |
| Depth | 134 mm | 133 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 810 g | 720 g | +90 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Jupiter Laser RTK better than Horus Visual & Laser?
- Battery life16 h vs 12 h+33%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 5+20%
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -30 °C+-25%
- Tracking channels1,668 vs 1,408+18%
Why is Horus Visual & Laser better than Jupiter Laser RTK?
- Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)No · Jupiter Laser RTK: Yes
- Internal storage4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Weight810 g vs 720 g+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | No | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L-band | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,668 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 60° |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 16 h | 12 h |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| External power input | 7.2V | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 810 g | 720 g |
| Width | 134 mm | 133 mm |
| Height | 66 mm | 72 mm |
| Depth | 134 mm | 133 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminium magnesium alloy | Magnesium-aluminum Alloy |
Related comparisons
vs
SingularXYZ SV100 INS-DvsComNav Jupiter Laser RTK
6.05.6
vs
eSurvey eRTK25vsComNav Jupiter Laser RTK
5.85.6
vs
SingularXYZ Z1 LitevsComNav Jupiter Laser RTK
6.15.6
vs
ComNav Jupiter Laser RTKvseSurvey eRTK10 mini
5.65.4
vs
ComNav Jupiter Laser RTKvsSingularXYZ Orion ONE-AR
5.65.6
vs
ComNav Jupiter Laser RTKvsSingularXYZ Orion ONE-Laser
5.65.6