- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- M100X vs Archer 4
ComNav M100X vs Juniper Archer 4
What M100X does better (1) and where Archer 4 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M100XArcher 4
| M100X | Archer 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 151 mm | 102 mm | +49 mm |
| Width | 27 mm | 42 mm | −15 mm |
| Depth | 103 mm | 34 mm | +69 mm |
| Weight | 300 g | 42 g | +258 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M100X better than Archer 4?
- L-band / PPP correctionsYes · Archer 4: No
Why is Archer 4 better than M100X?
- Weight300 g vs 42 g7.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | — |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2, B3, L-band | — |
| Tracking channels | — | 184 |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP | NTRIP (internet) |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | No |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Drop resistance | 1 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | — |
| Weight | 300 g | 42 g |
| Width | 27 mm | 42 mm |
| Height | 151 mm | 102 mm |
| Depth | 103 mm | 34 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminum Alloy | N/A |
