- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Mercury Laser RTK vs SV200 INS
ComNav Mercury Laser RTK vs SingularXYZ SV200 INS
What Mercury Laser RTK does better (2) and where SV200 INS wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Positioning8.6
2.1Maps & navigation7.7
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
8.7Durability9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mercury Laser RTKSV200 INS
| Mercury Laser RTK | SV200 INS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171 mm | 29 mm | +142 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 70 mm | +11 mm |
| Depth | 76 mm | 110 mm | −34 mm |
| Weight | 500 g | 203 g | +297 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mercury Laser RTK better than SV200 INS?
- RTK accuracy (vertical)5 mm vs 15 mm3×
- Tracking channels1,590 vs 1,408+13%
Why is SV200 INS better than Mercury Laser RTK?
- Weight500 g vs 203 g2.5×
- Operating temperature (max)65 °C vs 85 °C+31%
- Static accuracy (horizontal)3 mm vs 2.5 mm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,590 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 5 mm | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 3 mm | 2.5 mm |
| Position update rate | 20 Hz | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Max. tilt angle | 120° | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | No | — |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 4 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Camera | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Drop resistance | 1.5 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 85 °C |
| Weight | 500 g | 203 g |
| Width | 81 mm | 70 mm |
| Height | 171 mm | 29 mm |
| Depth | 76 mm | 110 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminium magnesium alloy | Aluminum alloy |
Related comparisons
vs
eSurvey eRTK80vsComNav Mercury Laser RTK
4.65.3
vs
eSurvey eRTK10 ProvsComNav Mercury Laser RTK
6.25.3
vs
ComNav Mercury Laser RTKvsArchimedes Innovation ARS30
vs
ComNav Mercury Laser RTKvsSingularXYZ Horus Visual & Laser
5.35.2
vs
ComNav Mercury Laser RTKvseSurvey eRTK10 mini
5.35.4
vs
SingularXYZ SV200 INSvsSingularXYZ SV100 INS
8.76.6