- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Mercury Laser RTK vs Q700
ComNav Mercury Laser RTK vs SpatiX Q700
What Mercury Laser RTK does better (5) and where Q700 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Positioning6.9
2.1Maps & navigation4.9
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
6.1Battery7.2
8.7Durability8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mercury Laser RTKQ700
| Mercury Laser RTK | Q700 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171 mm | 143 mm | +28 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 143 mm | −62 mm |
| Depth | 76 mm | 82 mm | −6 mm |
| Weight | 500 g | 985 g | −485 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mercury Laser RTK better than Q700?
- Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)Yes · Q700: No
- Weight500 g vs 985 g+97%
- RTK accuracy (vertical)5 mm vs 15 mm3×
- Battery life15 h vs 14 h+7%
- Tracking channels1,590 vs 1,520+5%
Why is Q700 better than Mercury Laser RTK?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 13,600 mAh2.7×
- Built-in UHF radioNo · Mercury Laser RTK: Yes
- Internal storage4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Static accuracy (horizontal)3 mm vs 2.5 mm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | No |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | L-band |
| Tracking channels | 1,590 | 1,520 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 5 mm | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 3 mm | 2.5 mm |
| Position update rate | 20 Hz | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | 120° | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, LoRa radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | No | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | 14 h |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 13,600 mAh |
| External power input | — | 5V DC |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Drop resistance | 1.5 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 500 g | 985 g |
| Width | 81 mm | 143 mm |
| Height | 171 mm | 143 mm |
| Depth | 76 mm | 82 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminium magnesium alloy | Magnesium aluminum alloy |
Related comparisons
vs
eSurvey eRTK80vsComNav Mercury Laser RTK
4.65.3
vs
eSurvey eRTK10 ProvsComNav Mercury Laser RTK
6.25.3
vs
ComNav Mercury Laser RTKvsArchimedes Innovation ARS30
vs
ComNav Mercury Laser RTKvsSingularXYZ Horus Visual & Laser
5.35.2
vs
ComNav Mercury Laser RTKvseSurvey eRTK10 mini
5.35.4
vs
Stonex S1000vsSpatiX Q700
7.67.4