- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Skadi 300 vs eRTK25
Eos Skadi 300 vs eSurvey eRTK25
What Skadi 300 does better (1) and where eRTK25 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is Skadi 300 better than eRTK25?
- Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)Yes · eRTK25: No
Why is eRTK25 better than Skadi 300?
- Operating temperature (min)-15 °C vs -30 °C+-50%
- Operating temperature (max)50 °C vs 70 °C+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | No |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E5a, E5b, B1, B2 | L-band |
| Tracking channels | — | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 12 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 13,400 mAh |
| Power source | — | Built-in rechargeable |
| Hot-swappable batteries | Yes | — |
| External power input | — | Type-C PD (12V/1.5A) |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | — | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -15 °C | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 50 °C | 70 °C |
| Weight | 935 g | 950 g |
| Width | — | 136 mm |
| Height | — | 74 mm |
| Depth | — | 74 mm |
| Housing material | Xenoy® with TPU overmold | — |
