- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- inBase vs Magic L
INTEC inBase vs INTEC Magic L
What inBase does better (0) and where Magic L wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is inBase better than Magic L?
inBase has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Magic L better than inBase?
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | 120° | 120° |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, LoRa radio, Cellular modem, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 18 h | 18 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Weight | 850 g | 850 g |
| Width | — | 132 mm |
| Height | — | 109 mm |
| Depth | — | 132 mm |
| Housing material | ABS | ABS |
