- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Wingman Mini vs M100X
Bushnell Wingman Mini vs ComNav M100X
What Wingman Mini does better (1) and where M100X wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Durability7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Wingman MiniM100X
| Wingman Mini | M100X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 102 mm | 151 mm | −49 mm |
| Width | 82 mm | 27 mm | +55 mm |
| Depth | 40 mm | 103 mm | −63 mm |
| Weight | 170 g | 300 g | −130 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Wingman Mini better than M100X?
- Weight170 g vs 300 g+76%
Why is M100X better than Wingman Mini?
- Satellite systems supported1 vs 55×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 1 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2, B3, L-band |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | — | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | — |
| Map types | Golf courses | — |
| Preloaded golf courses | 38,000 | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | — | 1 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 75 °C |
| Weight | 170 g | 300 g |
| Width | 82 mm | 27 mm |
| Height | 102 mm | 151 mm |
| Depth | 40 mm | 103 mm |
| Housing material | — | Aluminum Alloy |
