- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- P5 vs M300 Mini
CHCNAV P5 vs ComNav M300 Mini
What P5 does better (1) and where M300 Mini wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
P5M300 Mini
| P5 | M300 Mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 69 mm | 52 mm | +17 mm |
| Width | 150 mm | 142 mm | +8 mm |
| Depth | 200 mm | 191 mm | +9 mm |
| Weight | 2,150 g | 800 g | +1,350 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P5 better than M300 Mini?
- Tracking channels624 vs 496+26%
Why is M300 Mini better than P5?
- Weight2,150 g vs 800 g2.7×
- Operating temperature (max)65 °C vs 75 °C+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, B1, B2, B3 | — |
| Tracking channels | 624 | 496 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2.5 mm | 2.5 mm |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | — |
| External power input | 9 V DC to 36 V DC | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | — | 1 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 2,150 g | 800 g |
| Width | 150 mm | 142 mm |
| Height | 69 mm | 52 mm |
| Depth | 200 mm | 191 mm |
| Housing material | — | Rugged aluminum alloy |
