- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- A100 vs G100
ComNav A100 vs ComNav G100
What A100 does better (7) and where G100 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
A100G100
| A100 | G100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 72 mm | 50 mm | +22 mm |
| Width | 132 mm | 72 mm | +60 mm |
| Depth | 132 mm | 137 mm | −5 mm |
| Weight | 700 g | 350 g | +350 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A100 better than G100?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)Yes · G100: No
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 3+33%
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -20 °C+-50%
- Tracking channels352 vs 200+76%
- Drop resistance2 m vs 1.5 m+33%
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 60 °C+25%
Why is G100 better than A100?
- Weight700 g vs 350 g2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 3 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | No |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2 | L1, B1 |
| Tracking channels | 352 | 200 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2.5 mm | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, SBAS | SBAS |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 9 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,400 mAh |
| External power input | 6 - 36 VDC, with overvoltage protection | 5-27 VDC |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | 1.5 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 60 °C |
| Weight | 700 g | 350 g |
| Width | 132 mm | 72 mm |
| Height | 72 mm | 50 mm |
| Depth | 132 mm | 137 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminum-magnesium alloy | — |
