- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- G200 vs GCX3
ComNav G200 vs Sokkia GCX3
What G200 does better (2) and where GCX3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
G200GCX3
| G200 | GCX3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 50 mm | 197 mm | −147 mm |
| Width | 72 mm | 47 mm | +25 mm |
| Depth | 137 mm | 47 mm | +90 mm |
| Weight | 350 g | 440 g | −90 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is G200 better than GCX3?
- RTK accuracy (horizontal)8 mm vs 10 mm+25%
- Weight350 g vs 440 g+26%
Why is GCX3 better than G200?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx7+40%
- Battery life9 h vs 10 h+11%
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2 | L1, L2, E1, B1, B2 |
| Tracking channels | 352 | — |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | 10 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 3 mm | — |
| Correction sources | SBAS | SBAS |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 10 h |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| External power input | 5-27 VDC | Service port (shared with USB2.0 communication) |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP65 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 1.5 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -20 °C | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 60 °C | — |
| Weight | 350 g | 440 g |
| Width | 72 mm | 47 mm |
| Height | 50 mm | 197 mm |
| Depth | 137 mm | 47 mm |
