- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- M100X vs Reach RX2
ComNav M100X vs Emlid Reach RX2
What M100X does better (0) and where Reach RX2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is M100X better than Reach RX2?
M100X has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Reach RX2 better than M100X?
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 6+20%
- Weight300 g vs 280 g+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2, B3, L-band | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 7 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP | NTRIP (internet) |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 16 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Drop resistance | 1 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | — |
| Weight | 300 g | 280 g |
| Width | 27 mm | — |
| Height | 151 mm | — |
| Depth | 103 mm | — |
| Housing material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
