- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Mercury Laser RTK vs Xbase
ComNav Mercury Laser RTK vs SingularXYZ Xbase
What Mercury Laser RTK does better (5) and where Xbase wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Positioning8.1
2.1Maps & navigation4.9
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
6.1Battery2.4
8.7Durability6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mercury Laser RTKXbase
| Mercury Laser RTK | Xbase | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171 mm | 93 mm | +78 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 145 mm | −64 mm |
| Depth | 76 mm | 145 mm | −69 mm |
| Weight | 500 g | 1,204 g | −704 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mercury Laser RTK better than Xbase?
- Battery life15 h vs 8 h+88%
- Weight500 g vs 1,204 g2.4×
- RTK accuracy (vertical)5 mm vs 15 mm3×
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -30 °C+-25%
- Tracking channels1,590 vs 1,408+13%
Why is Xbase better than Mercury Laser RTK?
- Built-in UHF radioNo · Mercury Laser RTK: Yes
- Internal storage4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Drop resistance1.5 m vs 2 m+33%
- Static accuracy (horizontal)3 mm vs 2.5 mm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,590 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 5 mm | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 3 mm | 2.5 mm |
| Position update rate | 20 Hz | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | 120° | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | No | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | 8 h |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Drop resistance | 1.5 m | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 500 g | 1,204 g |
| Width | 81 mm | 145 mm |
| Height | 171 mm | 93 mm |
| Depth | 76 mm | 145 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminium magnesium alloy | Magnesium-aluminum Alloy |
Related comparisons
vs
eSurvey eRTK80vsComNav Mercury Laser RTK
4.65.3
vs
eSurvey eRTK10 ProvsComNav Mercury Laser RTK
6.25.3
vs
ComNav Mercury Laser RTKvsArchimedes Innovation ARS30
vs
ComNav Mercury Laser RTKvsSingularXYZ Horus Visual & Laser
5.35.2
vs
ComNav Mercury Laser RTKvseSurvey eRTK10 mini
5.35.4
vs
Alpha GEO Falcon XvsSingularXYZ Xbase
3.84.2