- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Skadi 300 vs TGS
Eos Skadi 300 vs TechnoGIS TGS
What Skadi 300 does better (0) and where TGS wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is Skadi 300 better than TGS?
Skadi 300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TGS better than Skadi 300?
- Operating temperature (min)-15 °C vs -40 °C+-62%
- Weight935 g vs 850 g+10%
- Operating temperature (max)50 °C vs 85 °C+70%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E5a, E5b, B1, B2 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3, L-band |
| Tracking channels | — | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 5 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Position update rate | — | 1 Hz |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 60° |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 30 h |
| Hot-swappable batteries | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Drop resistance | — | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -15 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 50 °C | 85 °C |
| Weight | 935 g | 850 g |
| Width | — | 85 mm |
| Height | — | 130 mm |
| Depth | — | 130 mm |
| Housing material | Xenoy® with TPU overmold | Magnesium Alloy and ABS industrial grade |
