- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- M100X vs Marvel Lite
ComNav M100X vs INTEC Marvel Lite
What M100X does better (2) and where Marvel Lite wins (1) — every spec side by side.
3.9Positioning3.1
7.5Durability8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
M100XMarvel Lite
| M100X | Marvel Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 151 mm | 89 mm | +62 mm |
| Width | 27 mm | 120 mm | −93 mm |
| Depth | 103 mm | 89 mm | +14 mm |
| Weight | 300 g | 660 g | −360 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M100X better than Marvel Lite?
- Weight300 g vs 660 g2.2×
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 4+25%
Why is Marvel Lite better than M100X?
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -45 °C+-11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 4 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2, B3, L-band | — |
| Tracking channels | — | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP | UHF radio, LoRa radio, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 20 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 1 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -45 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 300 g | 660 g |
| Width | 27 mm | 120 mm |
| Height | 151 mm | 89 mm |
| Depth | 103 mm | 89 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminum Alloy | ABS |
